목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
1. 남녀관리자의 리더십비교
2. 리더십과 조직적응의 관련성
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 분석 및 결과
V. 결론 및 논의
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
1. 남녀관리자의 리더십비교
2. 리더십과 조직적응의 관련성
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 분석 및 결과
V. 결론 및 논의
본문내용
cts of sex, marital status, and educational background on selection decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 93-103.
Rice, R.W., Bender, L.R., & Vitter, A.G. 1980. Leader sex, follower attitudes toward women, and leadership effectiveness: A laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 46-78.
Riger, S., & Galligan, P. 1980. Women in management: An explanation of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35, 902-910.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T.H. 1973. The influence of sex role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 44-48.
Schriesheim, J.F. 1980. The Social Context of leader- subordinate relations: An investigation of the effects of group cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 183-194.
Smith, J.E. 1986. Women in management(1979-1984): A review of the literature. Paper, American Psychological Association, New York.
Stogdill, R. M. 1963. Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-Form : An experimental revision. Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Szilagyi, A.D. 1980. Reward behavior of male and female leaders: A casual inference analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 59-72.
Terborg, J.R., & Shingledecker, P. 1983. Employee reactions to supervision and work evaluation as a function of subordinate and manager sex. Sex Roles, 9(7), 813-824.
Tsui, A.S., & Gutek, B.A. 1984. A role set analysis of gender differences in performance, affective relationships, and career success of industrial middle managers. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 619-635.
Wood, M.M. 1976. Women in management: How is it working out? Advanced Management Journal, 41, 22-30.
Yerby, J. 1975. Attitude, task, and sex composition as variables affecting female leadership in small problem- solving group. Speech Monographs, 42, 160-168.
Leadership and Managerial Success
: Comparison of Male & Female Managers
Hye-Ryun Kang
ABSTRACT
This study aims to compare male and female leadership and to identify the relationship between leader behavior and managerial success. Leadership behavior was measured in terms of two dimensions : initiating of structure and consideration. Promotion Index(PI) was developed for the measure of managerial success. The sample for this study consisted of 890 managers from 12 companies in Korea.
Research findings can be summarized as follows : Firstly, male managers scored higher than females on initiating structure but the higher the level of women managers, the higher the score of initiating structure. Secondly, the difference of PI between male and female was significant but it was disappeared on professional jobs. Thirdly, initiating structure influenced PI of both managers significantly but negatively, which had stronger effect for the higher level of women managers. Finally, the study discussed managerial implications and limitations of the research and suggested several directions for future research.
Rice, R.W., Bender, L.R., & Vitter, A.G. 1980. Leader sex, follower attitudes toward women, and leadership effectiveness: A laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 46-78.
Riger, S., & Galligan, P. 1980. Women in management: An explanation of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35, 902-910.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T.H. 1973. The influence of sex role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 44-48.
Schriesheim, J.F. 1980. The Social Context of leader- subordinate relations: An investigation of the effects of group cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 183-194.
Smith, J.E. 1986. Women in management(1979-1984): A review of the literature. Paper, American Psychological Association, New York.
Stogdill, R. M. 1963. Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-Form : An experimental revision. Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Szilagyi, A.D. 1980. Reward behavior of male and female leaders: A casual inference analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 59-72.
Terborg, J.R., & Shingledecker, P. 1983. Employee reactions to supervision and work evaluation as a function of subordinate and manager sex. Sex Roles, 9(7), 813-824.
Tsui, A.S., & Gutek, B.A. 1984. A role set analysis of gender differences in performance, affective relationships, and career success of industrial middle managers. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 619-635.
Wood, M.M. 1976. Women in management: How is it working out? Advanced Management Journal, 41, 22-30.
Yerby, J. 1975. Attitude, task, and sex composition as variables affecting female leadership in small problem- solving group. Speech Monographs, 42, 160-168.
Leadership and Managerial Success
: Comparison of Male & Female Managers
Hye-Ryun Kang
ABSTRACT
This study aims to compare male and female leadership and to identify the relationship between leader behavior and managerial success. Leadership behavior was measured in terms of two dimensions : initiating of structure and consideration. Promotion Index(PI) was developed for the measure of managerial success. The sample for this study consisted of 890 managers from 12 companies in Korea.
Research findings can be summarized as follows : Firstly, male managers scored higher than females on initiating structure but the higher the level of women managers, the higher the score of initiating structure. Secondly, the difference of PI between male and female was significant but it was disappeared on professional jobs. Thirdly, initiating structure influenced PI of both managers significantly but negatively, which had stronger effect for the higher level of women managers. Finally, the study discussed managerial implications and limitations of the research and suggested several directions for future research.
키워드
추천자료
- [리더십][리더쉽][리더십개발][리더쉽개발]리더십과 리더십 개발(사례)(리더십 개념, 거래적 ...
- 조직의 환경적응과 변화
- <간호지도자론-사례적용>하우스의 경로-목표이론에 근거하여 속해있는조직지도자행동유형판단...
- 인적자원개발의 3가지 유형인 개인개발, 경력개발, 조직개발의 특징을 비교하여 설명하고, 이...
- 여성인력의 성공적 조직 적응 유도를 위한 방안
- 사회복지전문화의 기원이라고 할 수 있는 자선조직협회와 인보관운동에 대하여 비교하여 설명
- 사회복지조직의 공공기관과 민간기관을 비교해 보시오
- 관리와 리더십-관리란,관리의 네가지기능계획,조직화,지휘,통제,리더와 관리자의 차이,전제적...
- 미시적 조직관리(리더십),관리자와 리더의 구분,리더십 포함요소,칼라슬의 리더십 유형, 리더...
- 리더십이론의 발전과정과 사회복지 조직에서의 바람직한 리더십 {리더십 정의와 리더십 이론...
- [조직組織과 환경] 조직환경의 변화과정, 조직환경의 유형분류, 조직상호간 환경적응방법
- [사회복지행정론] 조직문화의 의의, 리더십의 기능과 유형, 조직문화의 특성과 기능을 설명...
- 정주영 리더십과 이건희 리더십에 대하여 분석한 후 양자를 비교해서 서술하시오