복지한계

목차

I. 서론

II. 스웨덴 모델의 성공

III. 스웨덴 복지국가의 한계 : 그 의미와 시기

IV. 스웨덴 복지국가의 한계

V. 결론과 함의

본문내용

1-36.
Meidner, R.(1992). "The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model", Studies in Political Economy, vol. 39 : 159-171.
Milner, H.(1989). Sweden : Social Democracy in Practice, New York : Oxford University Press.
Moene, K. and Wallerstein, M.(1995). "How Social Democracy Worked : Labor-Market Institutions", Politics and Society, vol.23: 185-211.
Moses, J. (1994). "Abdication from National Policy Autonomy : what's Left to Leave", Politics and Society, vol.22 : 125-148.
Notermans, T.(1993). "The Abdication from National Policy Autonomy : Why the Macroeconomic Policy Regime Has Become So Unfavorable to Labor", Politics and society, vol. 21 : 133-167.
Obstfeld, M.(1998). "The Global Capital Market : Benefactor or Menace", Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.12 : 9-30.
Olsen, G.(1991). "Labor Mobilization and the Strength of Capital : The Rise and Stall of Economic Democracy in Sweden", Studies in Political Economy, vol. 34 : 109-145.
Olsen, G.(1996) "Re-modeling Sweden : The Rise and Demise of the Compromise in a Global Economy", Social Problems, vol.43 : 1-20.
Olson, M.(1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.
Rodrik, D.(1998). "Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments", Journal of Political Economy, vol.106 : 997-1032.
Rosen, S.(1996). "Public Employment and the Welfare State in Sweden", Journal of Economic Literature, vol.34 : 729-740.
Wood, A.(1998). "Globalization and the Rise in Labor Market Inequalities", The Economic Journal, vol.108 : 1463-1482.
OECD(1994). New Orientations for Social Policy, Paris: OECD.
______(1995). Economic Outlook, December.
______(1998). Economic Outlook, December.
______(1995). Income Distribution in OECD Countries, Paris : OECD.
______(1998). Economic Outlook, December, paris: OECD
ABSTRACT
The Limit of the Welfare State : Lessons from Sweden
Tae-sung Kim
The objective of this study is to explore the limits of Swedish Welfare State, particularly the limits of full employment policy which has been one of key elements of 'Swedish Model'. Three explanations are suggested in the paper as follows : First, changes in world economic environment, particularly world-wide deep recession in the 1970's and high levels of capital mobility under global economy, forced the main objective of Swedish macroeconomic policy to change from a fiscal expansionary policy like full employment policy to a restrictive policy which emphasizes low inflation.
Second, world-wide recession and high levels of capital mobility also weakened labor's power, while strengthened capital's power. So centralized bargaining between labor and capital which has been one of main elements for the success of Swedish model, has been greatly declined. This also contributed to the limits of Swedish welfare state.
Third, decline of manufacturing industry with large number of homogeneous semi-skilled labor, high demand for skilled labor, and fragmentation of labor unions also contributed to the limits of swedish welfare state.

키워드

복지한계,   스웨덴,   복지국가,   완전고용,   긴축정책