복잡성 이론과 조직학습 :시스템이론 복잡성이론

목차

:자기조직적 질서와 발현적 학습의 모색

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 복잡성 이론의 면모

Ⅲ. 복잡성 이론과 시스템 이론
1. 시스템의 이중성(二重性)과 시스템 이론의 전개
2. 복잡성 이론과 자기조직적 질서

Ⅳ. 자기조직화의 원리와 조건
1. 자기조직화
2. 자기조직화의 조건

Ⅴ. 자기조직화와 조직학습
1. 시스템의 이중성과 학습의 두 유형
2. 조직학습 연구에의 시사점

Ⅵ. 결 론

참 고 문 헌


**한글97

본문내용

ne, I. & Stengers, I. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam Books.
Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
Stacey, R. 1996. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics. London: Pitman Publishing.
The Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation. 1996. Field Guide: Embracing Complexity. July 1996. Ernst & Young LLP.
Waldrop, M. M. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Viking.
Weick, K. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wheatley, M. 1992. Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Complexity Theory and Organizational Learning: Toward Self-Organized Order and Emergent Learning
Myung-Ho Chung·Seungkwon Jang
ABSTRACT
This paper tries to discuss the recent development of complexity theory, and to articulate the possible application of the key concepts of complexity theory to organization theory. In this regard, we mainly argued two points. Firstly, complexity theory can be regarded as a new paradigm of system theory. Secondly, complexity theory as system theory can be applied to research themes of organizational learning. Especially, the notion of self-organization is able to give researchers new insight to studies on organizational learning.
Through the history of organizational studies, system theory has played a significant role as it has played in social sciences as a whole. Nonetheless, the conventional interpretation of system theory is rather one-sided. Most organization theorists do not illuminate the fact that system theory has theoretically stressed on two aspects of systems -- order and disorder; moreover, the orderly aspect of systems also consists of two types of order -- 'intended order' and 'self-organized order'. Thus, the mainstream organization theory has overestimated the significance of intended order in systems. In contrast, complexity theory highlights both orderly and disorderly features of systems, and deals with self-organized order out of disorder in systems.
Studies of organizational learning has focused on the development and accumulation of organizational resources and knowledge systems. In this regard, organizational learning is related to complexity theory that is mainly concerned with evolution of systems. But many researches on organizational learning have underlined the significance of 'planned learning', while 'emergent learning' has been ignored. Emergent learning is taken seriously so that the attention should be shifted from planning directly the outcome of organization learning to managing indirectly enabling conditions of organizational learning. In conclusion, it is argued that organizational learning should include the notion of emergent learning in the sense that complexity theory can help the study of organizational learning.

키워드

복잡성,   시스템이론,   복잡성이론,   조직학습