도심재개발 활성화 방안
닫기
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
해당 자료는 10페이지 까지만 미리보기를 제공합니다.
10페이지 이후부터 다운로드 후 확인할 수 있습니다.

목차

第 1 章 서 논 11
1. 연구의 목적 11
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 12

第 2 章 도심재개발사업의 현황 15
1. 도심재개발사업의 변천 및 시행절차 15
2. 사업추진현황 18
3. 특성분석 18

第 3 章 도심재개발의 의사결정 23
1. 기존 연구의 검토 23
2. 도시경제학적 접근 24
3. 도심재개발의 참여주체별 결정조건 25

第 4 章 도심재개발 이해주체간의 갈등 분석 29
1. 면담조사 29
2. 면담결과 도출된 사안별 의견 분석 31
3. 이해주체별 갈등관계 38

第 5 章 정책목표 및 수단간의 상충관계 41
1. 정책목표간의 상충 41
2. 민감도분석을 통해 본 정책수단간 효과 비교 42

第 6 章 도심재개발의 활성화 방안 및 결론 47
1. 도심재개발 활성화 방안 47
2. 결론 59

본문내용

-off relationships among policy alternatives.
The study suggests that the alternative policy values should be compromised between public benefits and private property rights, between the results and the processes of the development, between needs and possiblities, and between the physical best and the social best. Strong leaderships are required to co-ordinate various interests and support the process, recognizing that the urban renewal of inner city areas may bring benefits to all of the related sectors. Development methods for related citizens to express their opinions and be involved in the development processes should be established. Effectiveness should be maximized within constraints, revising irrational legistlations and simplifying complicated admistration procedures.
More concrete devices to correct the existing problems are also introduced. First, flexible development methods should be selected. Current urban renewal districts of inner city ateas should be re-evaluated and various development methods depending on the characteristics of individual districts should be established.
Second, legislative justices should be realized. Property assessment methods and systems should be improved to remove the possibilities to be biased for or against the specific sector. Related taxes should be deducted for the groups who lose due to the urban renewal district appointments while excess development profits should be collected.
Third, countermeasures should be prepared for petty landowners and tenants who are deprived of their grounds by developments. Although current functions should be maintained as much as possible, the estates for emigration should be secured in unavoidable cases. Develoment methods like cycling redevelopment methods might be introduced and legislations should be modified so that residential sites for demolished emigrants may be provided.
Fourth, the effectivenesses of the process should be maximized within several constraints. Administration procedures should be simplified and improved. Various complains about the urban renewal processes of inner city areas are collected and monitored to check whether the related legistlations might be changed or not.
Fifth, leadership should be strengthened to incorporate social capabilities and persuade stubborn individuals. Local governments are recommended to be involved with the projects to co-ordinate the different sectors. Joint sectors by landowners, local governments, public authorities, and private companies should be established to pursue for both public and private benefits. The system might be a mechanism to control the excessive profits or losses automatically. Only small amount of government investment is effective enough to make the participants trust the projects.
국토연97-
도심재개발 활성화 방안 연구
인 쇄·1997년 9월 30일
발 행·1997년 9월 30일
발행자·홍 철
발행처·국토개발연구원
주 소·경기도 안양시 동안구 관양동 1591-6(431-060)
전 화·0343-80-0114
팩시밀리·0343-80-0470·0480
이 보고서는 실비로 보급하고 있으니
필요하신 분은 자료실(0343-80-0429)로
문의하시기 바랍니다.

키워드

  • 가격3,300
  • 페이지수117페이지
  • 등록일2002.11.05
  • 저작시기2002.11
  • 파일형식한글(hwp)
  • 자료번호#210417
본 자료는 최근 2주간 다운받은 회원이 없습니다.
청소해
다운로드 장바구니