환경문제의 특성및 이론적 시각

목차

제 1 장 서 론
제 1 절 연구의 목적
제 2 절 연구범위 및 방법

제 2 장 이론적 배경
제 1 절 환경문제의 특성 및 이론적 시각
1. 환경문제의 특성
2. 환경문제를 바라보는 제시각
1) 경제성장 우선론과 환경보존 우선론, 그리고 지속가능한 발전론
2) 환경관리주의 대 생태주의
3) 의회의 환경문제에 대한 시각
제 2 절 환경정책참여자로서 국회의 위상
1. 의회주의의 원리
2. 의회의 기능과 상임위원회 제도
1) 의회의 기능
2) 상임위원회 제도
3. 환경정책 참여자로서 국회의 역할과 한계
제 3 절 분석의 틀
1. 정책형성으로서의 입법과정
2. 상임위원회의 입법심사과정에서의 역할변수

제 3 장 법률안 발의 및 심의과정에서의 환경노동위원회의 역할 분석
제 1 절 환경법률 및 환경조직의 변천과정
1. 환경법률의 변천과정
2. 환경조직의 변천과정
제 2 절 정책의제설정에 있어서의 역할
1. 정책의제설정자
1) 법률안을 통한 정책의제설정
2) 청원을 통한 정책의제설정
2. 정책의제 내용
제 3 절 정책결정과정에 있어서의 역할
1. 심의기간
2. 심의과정
1) 상임위원회의 전문성
2) 상임위원회 운영현황
3) 소위원회의 심사활동
(1)의의
(2) 환경노동위원회의 소위원회 활동
① 회의 개최 현황
② 소위원회 의결의 의도실현
4) 공청회등
(1) 공청회
(2) 청문회
(3) 연석회의
3. 심의 내용
1) 법안 처리
2) 청원의 처리
제 4 절 정책의도의 실현

제 4 장 분석의 종합
제 1 절 정책의제설정에서의 역할
1. 역할의 자주성 분석결과
2. 역할의 포괄성 분석결과
제 2 절 정책결정과정에서의 역할
1. 역할의 능률성 분석결과
2. 역할의 충실성 분석결과
3. 역할의 효과성 분석결과

제 4 장 결 론

본문내용

methodology of this study are described. The purpose of this study is to expain the role of ELSC in environmental policy making during the 14th session of the National Assembly.
In chapter 2, I took a good look at the articles on the attribute of environmental problem, the necessity of political intervention in a solution to environmental problem, and the role of the National Assembly as a participant of environmental policy making process. This study focuses on the role of ELSC in the environmental policy making. For the profound analysis, I classified the policy making process into two parts, or the policy agenda-setting process and the policy making process in a narrow sense.
In chapter 3, I analyzed the role of ELSC in the environmental policy agenda-setting process. The results of the analysis let us know two facts. First, as a environmental bill proposer, ELSC scacely played an important role. It proposed only 7 among 35 bill suggestions and those bills were not handled at all. Second, the scope of ELSC's concern was not very wide. It mainly took an interest water pollution and overall environmental policy.
In chapter 4, I can find the facts that ELSC was a little active. In the review period, most of environmental bills by Ministry of Environment(MOE) was handled during the same session. In review process, ELSC played relatively active role in a general meeting. It opreated a general meeting as an arena of interpellation for MOE and exchange of views with MOE on environmental policy. In the handling of environmental bills, the activity of sug-committee was very impressive. The results of sub-committee's review on environmental measures had an absolute influence on the decision of a general meetiin and a plenary session. In the operation of public hearing, ELSC hold once for all public hearing on drinking water. In the passage of environmental bills, the role of ELSC, especially that of sub-committee for bill review, was great. It revised the content of most of bills by MOE, but revised content was connected with execution proceedings, not vital parts of bills.
In chapter 4, I showed the evaluation of the ELSC's role.
1) ELSC scarcely played a role in the environmental policy agenda-setting process and had a narrow interest in only water pollution and general environmental policy.
2) ELSC was a little active in a general meeting, and sub-committee for the review of environmental bills had a absolute influence in decision of a general meeting and a plenary session. But the degree of sub-committee's revision was not so considerable.
In chapter 5, I made the limitation of this study clear and proposed the further study of internal party-government council for the better understanding of the National Assembly, of ELSC.
key words : Environment and Labor Standing Committee, Environmental policy making, Policy agenda-setting, Contents of policy agenda, Sub-committee for the review of a bill, Public hearing, A bill handling, A petition handling

키워드

환경정책,   환경문제,   환경보존,   역할의 포괄성 분석결과,   정책결정과정에서의 역할,   역할의 효과성 분석결과